Mike at Direct Telecom is leading the way with online marketing by using social networking sites to highlight the services that Direct Telecom have to offer. Mike has now opened accounts on Facebook, FlickrSquidoo, Youtube and many other sites to improve their online presence. If you want to find out more about Direct Telecom, check out their blog at www.direct-telecom.info

Last week Google unveiled Google SearchWiki, the first major change in ages. So is this the search engine that anyone can edit? No. Not quite that! Actually when you boil it down, this half-baked attempt for Google to go Web 2.0 is one big disappointment, no matter what Google has to say.

Google SearchWiki lets you personalise your search results by moving individual entries up or down the list, or deleting them altogether. Only you will be able to see these changes and only when you are logged into your Google account. Nothing Web 2.0 about that is there?

You can actually add comments to your favourite sites on Google SearchWiki, but for anyone else to see them, they must be logged into their Google acount click a link hidden at the very bottom of the SearchWiki page. The trouble is that not all searches will have comments of course and getting a message saying no comments found is bound to get tiring in no time.

But the worst is still to come: you cannot edit or delete the comments that other people make, but merely vote them up or down. So much for being a wiki! If this were a wiki, people would be able to make changes to each other’s contributions, discuss the edits, revert to older versions and all that jazz.

As things stand, as ReadWriteWeb rightly points out, Google SearchWiki is all open to abuse:

Try a search for McDonald’s, for example. There are two notes - one from some random web designer that’s spamming the “wiki” with a link to his page, the other from some joker testing the obscenity filter. Neither can be removed, edited, nothing. We presume that the McDonald’s PR department has seen this - but is there anything that even they can do about it? Apparently not. Wait until it’s you that has things you don’t like appended to the page just one click away from page 1 Google for your name - what are you going to do about it?

So is there any hope at all for SearchWiki, beyond a glorified bookmarking service or a dirty way to get back at people or websites you don’t like? Hopefully yes. If Google pay any attention to all the negative comments buzzing around the web they’ll be taking this one back to the drawingboard and reworking it into a the collaborative search engine of everyone’s dreams.

Am I being too optimistic?

We have always been very strong advocates of linking to other sites in your blog posts and articles, and last month, Google confirmed on their official blog what we knew all along: it’s good to spread the link love, and it won’t damage your rankings as long as the links are good ones.

Outbound linking boosts your credibility

Google also agrees that good outbound links help to boost your credibility by establishing your blog as a valuable reference for your visitors. When people see that you have done your research and are happy to share your findings with them, they will come back to your site again and again. And if you contribute to the discussion by adding your own comments and your own perspective on the matter, your posts become even more valuable and relevant.

What’s more, linking helps you make contact with webmasters of other sites, who could be linking back to you in the future.

But won’t I lose visitors by linking?

Of course, the number one concern about outbound linking is that you would be losing visitors to the sites you link to, but read what Google had to say on that:

Visitors may initially leave your site to check out relevant information. But can you recall your behavior on sites that link to good articles outside their domain? Personally, I always come back to sites I feel provide commentary and additional resources. Sometimes I stay on the original site and just open up the interesting link in a different tab. It’s likely that with relevant outbound links you’ll gain repeat visitors, and you won’t lose them forever.

How to avoid the bad kind of links

To be sure, there is a kind of links that Google does not like and that will negatively affect your site. You guessed it: link spam. This includes both paid-for outbound links, and the self-promoting links that some of your blog readers will include (or more likely blatantly promote) in their comments.

There are different things you can do to avoid being penalised by such links. One is to have a solid anti-spam plugin that filters your comments, such as Askimet for WordPress. These plugins generally work by comparing your comments to a huge database of comment spam, and have a great success rate at weeding out the baddies. Still, they are not 100% foolproof. This means that you should also monitor and review your comments (ideally before they are published) to make sure that no spam gets through. Keeping spam out of your blog, of course also has the added benefit of making sure that all your readers see is juicy, relevant content.

Another thing you should consider doing in order to avoid link spam penalties is to set up your blog to include the nofollow attribute (rel=”nofollow”) in each and every user-generated link. When you do this, Google will completely ignore these links as though they never existed, meaning you don’t have to worry about them. Google also wants you to disclose paid-for outbound links with the nofollow attribute, even though this has created a great controversy among SEO specialists.

So, to summarise, link and link away as long as you do it responsibly and because the site you are linking to is interesting to your readers. A little common sense will go a long way when spreading the link love and sooner or later some of the karma will come back to you in the form of inbound links too.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites View John Beckley's LinkedIn profileView John Beckley's profile